ISBN | Product | Product | Price CHF | Available | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psychobabble and Biobunk: Using Psychological Science to Think Critically About Popular Psychology |
9780205015917 Psychobabble and Biobunk: Using Psychological Science to Think Critically About Popular Psychology |
51.90 |
![]() |
This revised and updated handbook features a selection of essay-style book reviews by Carol Tavris, written for the Times Literary Supplement, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Scientist, and The New York Times Book Review. These reviews apply psychological research and principles of scientific thinking to ideas presented in the books. They aim to show how critical thinking can help people assess arguments promoted in the popular culture, and how to separate those that are scientifically sound from those based on “psychobabble”–pop-psych notions dressed up in fancy, sciency-sounding language. These essays may be used to encourage debate in the classroom or as a basis for student papers. Students can be asked to write or present their own points of view on a topic, drawing on other research and the guidelines of critical thinking (defined and described in a prefatory “Note to the Reader”) to support their conclusions. Although these reviews can be used in many social science and composition courses, the topics covered and the critical-thinking guidelines that apply to them correspond to specific material in Carole Wade and Carol Tavris’s Psychology and Invitation to Psychology.
This handbook features a selection of essay-style book reviews by Carol Tavris, written for the Times Literary Supplement, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Scientist, and The New York Times Book Review.
These reviews apply psychological research and principles of scientific thinking.
They aim to show how critical thinking can help people assess arguments promoted in the popular culture, and how to separate those that are scientifically sound from those based on “psychobabble”–pop-psych notions dressed up in fancy, sciency-sounding language.
Why Do You Need this New Edition?
If you’re wondering why you should buy this new edition of
PSYCHOBABBLE AND BIOBUNK
Using Psychological Science to Think Critically
About Popular Psychology,
Here are 21 good reasons!
This third edition of Psychobabble and Biobunk contains twenty completely new essays and book reviews. The review of The Nurture Assumption has been retained from the previous edition to round out the “Personality, Motivation, and Development” section. The essays and book reviews presented here are:
Thinking Critically–and Why We Often Don’t1. “Why won’t they admit they’re wrong? And other skeptics’ mysteries” byCarol Tavris and Elliot Aronson
Personality, Motivation, and Development
2. Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell
3. Men to Boys: The making of modern immaturity, by Gary Cross
4. Understanding Attachment, by Jean Mercer
5. Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection, by Deborah Blum
6. Happiness: Lessons from a new science, by Richard Layard; Making Happy People: The nature of happiness and its origins in childhood, by Paul Martin; and Going Sane, by Adam Phillips7. Bright-Sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined Americaby Barbara Ehrenreich
8. The Nurture Assumption, by Judith Rich Harris 9. Personality, by Daniel Nettle 10. “Are Girls As Mean As They Say They Are?” (review essay) Psychotherapy and the Scientist-Practitioner Gap 11. The Body Never Lies, by Alice Miller12. Into the Minds of Madmen, by Don DeNevi & John Campbell
13. Remembering Trauma, by Richard McNally and Out of the Dark, by Linda Caine & Robin Royston
14. In Therapy We Trust, by Eva Moskowitz
15. Prisoners of Hate, by Aaron T. Beck
16. Making Us Crazy: DSM–The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders,
by Herb Kutchins and Stuart A. Kirk
17. Of Two Minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry, by T. M. Luhrmann
Research Methods and Social Issues
18. The Hungry Gene, by Ellen Ruppel Shell
19. The Genius Factory, by David Plotz
20. Rape: A history from 1860 to the present, by Joanna Bourke
21. Sex and the Psyche, by Brett Kahr
Thinking Critically–and Why We Often Don’t
1. “Why won’t they admit they’re wrong? And other skeptics’ mysteries” by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson
Personality, Motivation, and Development
2. Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell
3. Men to Boys: The making of modern immaturity, by Gary Cross
4. Understanding Attachment, by Jean Mercer
5. Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection, by Deborah Blum
6. Happiness: Lessons from a new science, by Richard Layard; Making Happy People: The nature of happiness and its origins in childhood, by Paul Martin; and Going Sane, by Adam Phillips7. Bright-Sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America,by Barbara Ehrenreich
8. The Nurture Assumption, by Judith Rich Harris
9. Personality, by Daniel Nettle
10. “Are Girls As Mean As They Say They Are?” (review essay)
Psychotherapy and the Scientist-Practitioner Gap
11. The Body Never Lies, by Alice Miller
12. Into the Minds of Madmen, by Don DeNevi & John Campbell
13. Remembering Trauma, by Richard McNally
14. In Therapy We Trust, by Eva Moskowitz
15. Prisoners of Hate, by Aaron T. Beck
16. Making Us Crazy: DSM–The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders,
by Herb Kutchins and Stuart A. Kirk
17. Of Two Minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry, by T. M. Luhrmann
Research Methods and Social Issues
18. The Hungry Gene, by Ellen Ruppel Shell
19. The Genius Factory, by David Plotz
20. Rape: A history from 1860 to the present, by Joanna Bourke
21. Sex and the Psyche, by Brett Kahr
This revised and updated handbook features a selection of essay-style book reviews by Carol Tavris, written for the Times Literary Supplement, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Scientist, and The New York Times Book Review. These reviews apply psychological research and principles of scientific thinking to ideas presented in the books. They aim to show how critical thinking can help people assess arguments promoted in the popular culture, and how to separate those that are scientifically sound from those based on “psychobabble”–pop-psych notions dressed up in fancy, sciency-sounding language. These essays may be used to encourage debate in the classroom or as a basis for student papers. Students can be asked to write or present their own points of view on a topic, drawing on other research and the guidelines of critical thinking (defined and described in a prefatory “Note to the Reader”) to support their conclusions. Although these reviews can be used in many social science and composition courses, the topics covered and the critical-thinking guidelines that apply to them correspond to specific material in Carole Wade and Carol Tavris’s Psychology and Invitation to Psychology.
Carol Tavris earned her Ph.D. in the interdisciplinary program in social psychology at the University of Michigan, and as a writer and lecturer she has sought to educate the public about the importance of critical and scientific thinking in psychology. In addition to this text, she and Carole Wade have written Psychology; Psychology in Perspective; and The Longest War: Sex Differences in Perspective. Dr. Tavris is also coauthor, with Elliot Aronson, of Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts; and author of The Mismeasure of Woman and Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion. She has written on psychological topics for a wide variety of magazines, journals, edited books, and newspapers, some of which have been collected in Psychobabble and Biobunk: Using psychological science to think critically about popular psychology. Dr. Tavris lectures widely on topics involving science vs. pseudoscience in psychology and psychiatry, on writing about science for the public, and many other subjects of contemporary interest. She has taught in the psychology department at UCLA and at the Human Relations Center of the New School for Social Research in New York. She is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and a charter Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science; a member of the editorial board of the APS journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest; and a member of the international advisory board of the Institute for Science and Human Values.