CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java, The

Fred Long / Dhruv Mohindra / Robert C. Seacord / Dean F. Sutherland / David Svoboda  
Total pages
September 2011
Related Titles

Product detail

Title no longer available

Table of Contents

Foreword xvii

Preface xix

Acknowledgments xxxi

About the Authors xxxiii

Chapter 1: Introduction 1

Misplaced Trust 2

Injection Attacks 2

Leaking Sensitive Data 4

Leaking Capabilities 6

Denial of Service 7

Serialization 10

Concurrency, Visibility, and Memory 11

Principle of Least Privilege 18

Security Managers 19

Class Loaders 21

Summary 21

Chapter 2: Input Validation and Data Sanitization (IDS) 23

Rules 23

Risk Assessment Summary 24

IDS00-J. Sanitize untrusted data passed across a trust boundary 24

IDS01-J. Normalize strings before validating them 34

IDS02-J. Canonicalize path names before validating them 36

IDS03-J. Do not log unsanitized user input 41

IDS04-J. Limit the size of files passed to ZipInputStream 43

IDS05-J. Use a subset of ASCII for file and path names 46

IDS06-J. Exclude user input from format strings 48

IDS07-J. Do not pass untrusted, unsanitized data to the Runtime.exec() method 50

IDS08-J. Sanitize untrusted data passed to a regex 54

IDS09-J. Do not use locale-dependent methods on locale-dependent data without specifying the appropriate locale 59

IDS10-J. Do not split characters between two data structures 60

IDS11-J. Eliminate noncharacter code points before validation 66

IDS12-J. Perform lossless conversion of String data between differing character encodings 68

IDS13-J. Use compatible encodings on both sides of file or network I/O 71

Chapter 3: Declarations and Initialization (DCL) 75

Rules 75

Risk Assessment Summary 75

DCL00-J. Prevent class initialization cycles 75

DCL01-J. Do not reuse public identifiers from the Java Standard Library 79

DCL02-J. Declare all enhanced for statement loop variables final 81

Chapter 4: Expressions (EXP) 85

Rules 85

Risk Assessment Summary 85

EXP00-J. Do not ignore values returned by methods 86

EXP01-J. Never dereference null pointers 88

EXP02-J. Use the two-argument Arrays.equals() method to compare the contents of arrays 90

EXP03-J. Do not use the equality operators when comparing values of boxed primitives 91

EXP04-J. Ensure that autoboxed values have the intended type 97

EXP05-J. Do not write more than once to the same variable within an expression 100

EXP06-J. Do not use side-effecting expressions in assertions 103

Chapter 5: Numeric Types and Operations (NUM) 105

Rules 105

Risk Assessment Summary 106

NUM00-J. Detect or prevent integer overflow 106

NUM01-J. Do not perform bitwise and arithmetic operations on the same data 114

NUM02-J. Ensure that division and modulo operations do not result in divide-by-zero errors 119

NUM03-J. Use integer types that can fully represent the possible range of unsigned data 121

NUM04-J. Do not use floating-point numbers if precise computation is required 122

NUM05-J. Do not use denormalized numbers 125

NUM06-J. Use the strictfp modifier for floating-point calculation consistency across platforms 128

NUM07-J. Do not attempt comparisons with NaN 132

NUM08-J. Check floating-point inputs for exceptional values 134

NUM09-J. Do not use floating-point variables as loop counters 136

NUM10-J. Do not construct BigDecimal objects from floating-point literals 138

NUM11-J. Do not compare or inspect the string representation of floating-point values 139

NUM12-J. Ensure conversions of numeric types to narrower types do not result in lost or misinterpreted data 141

NUM13-J. Avoid loss of precision when converting primitive integers to floating-point 146

Chapter 6: Object Orientation (OBJ) 151

Rules 151

Risk Assessment Summary 152

OBJ00-J. Limit extensibility of classes and methods with invariants to trusted subclasses only 152

OBJ01-J. Declare data members as private and provide accessible wrapper methods 159

OBJ02-J. Preserve dependencies in subclasses when changing superclasses 162

OBJ03-J. Do not mix generic with nongeneric raw types in new code 169

OBJ04-J. Provide mutable classes with copy functionality to safely allow passing instances to untrusted code 175

OBJ05-J. Defensively copy private mutable class members before returning their references 180

OBJ06-J. Defensively copy mutable inputs and mutable internal components 185

OBJ07-J. Sensitive classes must not let themselves be copied 189

OBJ08-J. Do not expose private members of an outer class from within a nested class 192

OBJ09-J. Compare classes and not class names 194

OBJ10-J. Do not use public static nonfinal variables 197

OBJ11-J. Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions 199

Chapter 7: Methods (MET) 209

Rules 209

Risk Assessment Summary 210

MET00-J. Validate method arguments 210

MET01-J. Never use assertions to validate method arguments 213

MET02-J. Do not use deprecated or obsolete classes or methods 215

MET03-J. Methods that perform a security check must be declared private or final 217

MET04-J. Do not increase the accessibility of overridden or hidden methods 218

MET05-J. Ensure that constructors do not call overridable methods 220

MET06-J. Do not invoke overridable methods in clone() 223

MET07-J. Never declare a class method that hides a method declared in a superclass or superinterface 226

MET08-J. Ensure objects that are equated are equatable 229

MET09-J. Classes that define an equals() method must also define a hashCode() method 238

MET10-J. Follow the general contract when implementing the compareTo() method 241

MET11-J. Ensure that keys used in comparison operations are immutable 243

MET12-J. Do not use finalizers 248

Chapter 8: Exceptional Behavior (ERR) 255

Rules 255

Risk Assessment Summary 255

ERR00-J. Do not suppress or ignore checked exceptions 256

ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information 263

ERR02-J. Prevent exceptions while logging data 268

ERR03-J. Restore prior object state on method failure 270

ERR04-J. Do not exit abruptly from a finally block 275

ERR05-J. Do not let checked exceptions escape from a finally block 277

ERR06-J. Do not throw undeclared checked exceptions 280

ERR07-J. Do not throw RuntimeException, Exception, or Throwable 285

ERR08-J. Do not catch NullPointerException or any of its ancestors 288

ERR09-J. Do not allow untrusted code to terminate the JVM 296

Chapter 9: Visibility and Atomicity (VNA) 301

Rules 301

Risk Assessment Summary 301

VNA00-J. Ensure visibility when accessing shared primitive variables 302

VNA01-J. Ensure visibility of shared references to immutable objects 306

VNA02-J. Ensure that compound operations on shared variables are atomic 309

VNA03-J. Do not assume that a group of calls to independently atomic methods is atomic 317

VNA04-J. Ensure that calls to chained methods are atomic 323

VNA05-J. Ensure atomicity when reading and writing 64-bit values 328

Chapter 10: Locking (LCK) 331

Rules 331

Risk Assessment Summary 332

LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code 332

LCK01-J. Do not synchronize on objects that may be reused 339

LCK02-J. Do not synchronize on the class object returned by getClass() 343

LCK03-J. Do not synchronize on the intrinsic locks of high-level concurrency objects 347

LCK04-J. Do not synchronize on a collection view if the backing collection is accessible 348

LCK05-J. Synchronize access to static fields that can be modified by untrusted code 351

LCK06-J. Do not use an instance lock to protect shared static data 352

LCK07-J. Avoid deadlock by requesting and releasing locks in the same order 355

LCK08-J. Ensure actively held locks are released on exceptional conditions 365

LCK09-J. Do not perform operations that can block while holding a lock 370

LCK10-J. Do not use incorrect forms of the double-checked locking idiom 375

LCK11-J. Avoid client-side locking when using classes that do not commit to their locking strategy 381

Chapter 11: Thread APIs (THI) 387

Rules 387

Risk Assessment Summary 387

THI00-J. Do not invoke Thread.run() 388

THI01-J. Do not invoke ThreadGroup methods 390

THI02-J. Notify all waiting threads rather than a single thread 394

THI03-J. Always invoke wait() and await() methods inside a loop 401

THI04-J. Ensure that threads performing blocking operations can be terminated 404

THI05-J. Do not use Thread.stop() to terminate threads 412

Chapter 12: Thread Pools (TPS) 417

Rules 417

Risk Assessment Summary 417

TPS00-J. Use thread pools to enable graceful degradation of service during traffic bursts 418

TPS01-J. Do not execute interdependent tasks in a bounded thread pool 421

TPS02-J. Ensure that tasks submitted to a thread pool are interruptible 428

TPS03-J. Ensure that tasks executing in a thread pool do not fail silently 431

TPS04-J. Ensure ThreadLocal variables are reinitialized when using thread pools 436

Chapter 13: Thread-Safety Miscellaneous (TSM) 441

Rules 441

Risk Assessment Summary 441

TSM00-J. Do not override thread-safe methods with methods that are not thread-safe 442

TSM01-J. Do not let the this reference escape during object construction 445

TSM02-J. Do not use background threads during class initialization 454

TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects 459

Chapter 14: Input Output (FIO) 467

Rules 467

Risk Assessment Summary 468

FIO00-J. Do not operate on files in shared directories 468

FIO01-J. Create files with appropriate access permissions 478

FIO02-J. Detect and handle file-related errors 481

FIO03-J. Remove temporary files before termination 483

FIO04-J. Close resources when they are no longer needed 487

FIO05-J. Do not expose buffers created using the wrap() or duplicate() methods to untrusted code 493

FIO06-J. Do not create multiple buffered wrappers on a single InputStream 496

FIO07-J. Do not let external processes block on input and output streams 500

FIO08-J. Use an int to capture the return value of methods that read a character or byte 504

FIO09-J. Do not rely on the write() method to output integers outside the range 0 to 255 507

FIO10-J. Ensure the array is filled when using read() to fill an array 509

FIO11-J. Do not attempt to read raw binary data as character data 511

FIO12-J. Provide methods to read and write little-endian data 513

FIO13-J. Do not log sensitive information outside a trust boundary 516

FIO14-J. Perform proper cleanup at program termination 519

Chapter 15: Serialization (SER) 527

Rules 527

Risk Assessment Summary 528

SER00-J. Maintain serialization compatibility during class evolution 528

SER01-J. Do not deviate from the proper signatures of serialization methods 531

SER02-J. Sign then seal sensitive objects before sending them across a trust boundary 534

SER03-J. Do not serialize unencrypted, sensitive data 541

SER04-J. Do not allow serialization and deserialization to bypass the security manager 546

SER05-J. Do not serialize instances of inner classes 549

SER06-J. Make defensive copies of private mutable components during deserialization 551

SER07-J. Do not use the default serialized form for implementation-defined invariants 553

SER08-J. Minimize privileges before deserializing from a privileged context 558

SER09-J. Do not invoke overridable methods from the readObject() method 562

SER10-J. Avoid memory and resource leaks during serialization 563

SER11-J. Prevent overwriting of externalizable objects 566

Chapter 16: Platform Security (SEC) 569

Rules 569

Risk Assessment Summary 570

SEC00-J. Do not allow privileged blocks to leak sensitive information across a trust boundary 570

SEC01-J. Do not allow tainted variables in privileged blocks 574

SEC02-J. Do not base security checks on untrusted sources 577

SEC03-J. Do not load trusted classes after allowing untrusted code to load arbitrary classes 579

SEC04-J. Protect sensitive operations with security manager checks 582

SEC05-J. Do not use reflection to increase accessibility of classes, methods, or fields 585

SEC06-J. Do not rely on the default automatic signature verification provided by URLClassLoader and java.util.jar 592

SEC07-J. Call the superclass’s getPermissions() method when writing a custom class loader 597

SEC08-J. Define wrappers around native methods 599

Chapter 17: Runtime Environment (ENV) 603

Rules 603

Risk Assessment Summary 603

ENV00-J. Do not sign code that performs only unprivileged operations 604

ENV01-J. Place all security-sensitive code in a single jar and sign and seal it 606

ENV02-J. Do not trust the values of environment variables 610

ENV03-J. Do not grant dangerous combinations of permissions 613

ENV04-J. Do not disable bytecode verification 617

ENV05-J. Do not deploy an application that can be remotely monitored 618

Chapter 18: Miscellaneous (MSC) 625

Rules 625

Risk Assessment Summary 625

MSC00-J. Use SSLSocket rather than Socket for secure data exchange 626

MSC01-J. Do not use an empty infinite loop 630

MSC02-J. Generate strong random numbers 632

MSC03-J. Never hard code sensitive information 635

MSC04-J. Do not leak memory 638

MSC05-J. Do not exhaust heap space 647

MSC06-J. Do not modify the underlying collection when an iteration is in progress 653

MSC07-J. Prevent multiple instantiations of singleton objects 657

Glossary 669

References 677

Index 693


Ve>Fred Long is a senior lecturer and director of learning and teaching in the Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University in the United Kingdom. He lectures on formal methods; Java, C++, and C programming paradigms and programming-related security issues. He is chairman of the British Computer Society’s Mid-Wales Sub-Branch. Fred has been a Visiting Scientist at the Software Engineering Institute since 1992. Recently, his research has involved the investigation of vulnerabilities in Java.

Dhruv Mohindra is a senior software engineer at Persistent Systems Limited, India, where he develops monitoring software for widely used enterprise servers. He has worked for CERT at the Software Engineering Institute and continues to collaborate to improve the state of security awareness in the programming community.

Dhruv has also worked for Carnegie Mellon University, where he obtained his master of science degree in information security policy and management. He holds an undergraduate degree in computer engineering from Pune University, India, where he researched with Calsoft, Inc., during his academic pursuit.

A writing enthusiast, Dhruv occasionally contributes articles to technology magazines and online resources. He brings forth his experience and learning from developing and securing service oriented applications, server monitoring software, mobile device applications, web-based data miners, and designing user-friendly security interfaces.

Robert C. Seacord is a computer security specialist and writer. He is the author of books on computer security, legacy system modernization, and component-based software engineering.

Robert manages the Secure Coding Initiative at CERT, located in Carnegie Mellon’s Software Engineering Institute in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. CERT, among other security-related activities, regularly analyzes software vulnerability reports and assesses the risk to the Internet and other critical infrastructure. Robert is an adjunct professor in the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and in the Information Networking Institute.

Robert started programming professionally for IBM in 1982, working in communications and operating system software, processor development, and software engineering. Robert also has worked at the X Consortium, where he developed and maintained code for the Common Desktop Environment and the X Window System. Robert has a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Dean F. Sutherland is a senior software security engineer at CERT. Dean received his Ph.D. in software engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 2008. Before his return to academia, he spent 14 years working as a professional software engineer at Tartan, Inc. He spent the last six of those years as a senior member of the technical staff and a technical lead for compiler backend technology. He was the primary active member of the corporate R&D group, was a key instigator of the design and deployment of a new software development process for Tartan, led R&D projects, and provided both technical and project leadership for the 12-person compiler back-end group.

David Svoboda is a software security engineer at CERT. David has been the primary developer on a diverse set of software development projects at Carnegie Mellon since 1991, ranging from hierarchical chip modeling and social organization simulation to automated machine translation (AMT). His KANTOO AMT software, developed in 1996, is still in production use at Caterpillar. He has over 13 years of Java development experience, starting with Java 2, and his Java projects include Tomcat servlets and Eclipse plug-ins. David is also actively involved in several ISO standards groups: the JTC1/SC22/WG14 group for the C programming language and the JTC1/ SC22/WG21 group for C++.